National newspaper editors don't often explain themselves or their strategies, so Daily Express editor Hugh Whittow's contribution to a book about Brexit and the media is a rare delight. Here are some extracts from his chapter. The words are his, the bold bits are mine:
"A newspaper which believes it can dictate what readers think
or how they should vote is doomed to failure."
"For 123 days in 2016, the Daily Express campaigned vigorously for Britain to vote to leave the EU. It was the culmination of a five-year crusade to have our membership put to the popular vote which began on November 25 2010. That day we ran a front page cartoon of the Crusader standing on the White Cliffs of Dover with a message that said We Want Our Country Back. More than 373,000 readers filled in a coupon published in the newspaper."
"The Daily Express became the first national newspaper to declare
outright support for UKIP and in January 2011 we published a unique 24-page
supplement carefully setting out the case for a UK withdrawal."
"By reflecting the views of our readers we were able to
influence the actions of MPs."
"Our unfaltering campaign saw UKIP secure 3,881,000 votes [in
the 2015 general election], more than the LibDems and SNP put together and on
February 20, 2016, Mr Cameron signalled a victory for the Daily Express by announcing
the referendum would be held on June 23. Thus started the most significant and
successful Daily Express editorial campaign in living memory."
"In the newspaper and online, front-page editorials, news
analysis and political commentaries totally captured the mood of the 17m-plus
people who eventually voted for Brexit."
"Some other newspapers, belatedly sensing the rising tide of
support for our campaign, which had unleashed people power, tried to emulate
us.
While we were happy and flattered to indirectly receive
their support, our five-year record demonstrated beyond dispute it was the
Daily Express which had been, all along, the architect of an editorial campaign
which brought about a dramatic political victory."
"Despite what critics of the Leave campaign might claim, it
was not built on anti-EU stories about straight bananas or 27,000-word laws on
the sale of cabbages."
"It was Project Hope versus Project Fear and as we have seen in the months following the referendum, the fear factor was grossly exaggerated.
"Many of my readers have written, phoned and emailed to complain bitterly about the misleading and mendacious half-truths they were bombarded with by the Remain campaign. If there’s one thing an editor who is doing his job should know, it’s that the people who buy the paper aren’t stupid. They aren’t easily conned."
"Where newspapers backing the Leave campaign scored well...was in the variety of issues they covered in such a positive way."
"We never doubted the intelligence of the people who were going to make the big decision about their futures."
"We never doubted the intelligence of the people who were going to make the big decision about their futures."
To maintain credibility, confidence and public support in the face of such overwhelming and unfair criticism was a massive challenge which our editorial team took on every day."
"The public appetite for intelligent analysis is as strong as
ever and that can only be good for the continued wellbeing of newspapers.
Those who voted on June 23 to be free and independent were
surely delivering a similar vote of confidence in the newspaper industry."
Brexit, Trump and the Media is edited by John Mair, Tor Clark, Neil Fowler, Raymond Snoddy and Richard Tait, and is published by Abramis, price £19.95.
There is another rather good chapter in in by someone not unlike the woman at the top of this blog.
No comments:
Post a Comment