Showing posts with label Getting the facts in a story. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Getting the facts in a story. Show all posts
Wednesday, 4 April 2012
Animal magic
A sniffer dog saved a man in the first minute of its first mission yesterday after a gas blast destroyed a Victorian house in Clacton that had been converted into flats.
Kersley Vythilingum, 30, was trapped for two hours in the top-floor rubble before being found by Kirby, a springer spaniel that completed its training on Thursday.
Andree Massey, 80, was rescued from the ground floor and taken to hospital with severe burns.
Clarel Sainte-Marie, 37, led his pregnant wife and two children from the first floor to safety on the roof. Their hamster Lilly was found safe 12 hours later.
Just wanted to check I could tell the whole story in 100 words, and - at the risk of being accused of Brick-like conceit - I think the end result passes muster.
If I'd allowed myself more words I could have added that Ms Massey lived on the ground floor, that Mr Vythilingum was a care worker and that Mrs Sainte-Marie is seven months pregnant. I could have included the names and ages of her children, and quotes from her husband - who woke 'without a ceiling' - or Kirby's handler, Graham Currie, who hailed the dog a hero.
When space is a constraint, it is the sub's job to make decisions on what to tell the reader and what to leave out. If you take the view that no one will have heard of these people so their names don't matter in a short, you end up with an anonymous piece that is meaningless. But while the identities of all the characters in this little drama were available, it wasn't essential to include every name. I'd have liked to have known the ages of the dog and the hamster.
This story was given big play across the papers yesterday and the different treatments are intriguing. I was particularly interested to see which facts made which paper - and in what order.
No one died - although Ms Massey was critically ill - so it wasn't a particular tragedy. Houses do blow up thanks to leaky gas pipes, so generally the availability of pictures will determine the newsworthiness of an explosion.
In this instance there was an abundance of pictures. There was a 'before' photograph of the house with a red car outside and an 'after' with the building reduced to rubble with a different red car buried in the detritus. There were pictures of Mr Sainte-Marie, of Kirby and his handler, of Lilly in her cage. There was even an aerial shot. Picture desks must have been beside themselves with joy: all praise to the agency that was on the case.
No matter how much space they devoted to the story, no newspaper included every fact that appears in my opening paragraph. Some sacrificed snippets of detail for writing style - a legitimate choice - while others left out the basics.
To my mind, the following were essential:
1: the event and where it happened
2: the human cost, including at least one name
3: the dog's actions, including its name
4: the hamster, including its name
After that, it would be good to see other names, detail, background, quotes as space allows.
Even though I've placed it at no 3, the key element of this story has to be the dog. It is the USP, if you like, the factor that lifts this from any old 'gas blast in essex, nobody killed' filler. All stories must tell us what happened, where and to whom, so the event and the people had to head the list of priorities - but that doesn't mean they have to be at the top of the story.
Pictorially, I'd want
1: the destroyed building
2; the dog
3: the hamster
4; anything else available
So here's a random survey of some of the coverage with a SubScribe rating. Marks are given up to a maximum of 5* for the heading and use of pictures, while stars for content are awarded arbitrarily for extra detail and deducted if essential facts are missing.
Mail:
Six people (and a hamster) survive gas blast
Three-col photograph of wreckage with hamster inset, single column pix of house before blast, Mr and Mrs Sainte-Marie and aerial shot of rubble
12-par delayed drop story:
When the firemen arrived, they must have feared the worst.
An explosion tore this three-storey Victorian property apart at 2.30am yesterday - but incredibly nobody was killed.
The seven survivors even include a nine-year-old's pet hamster, which was plucked from the wreckage alive in its cage....
Does mention all names and ages of the human cast and quotes several. Gives detail of timing and the scale of the ensuing fire. Fire brigade praise for Mr Sainte-Marie for rescuing his family and condition reports on the injured. The dog merits only a passing mention in the middle, so there's a big black mark for failing to recognise its importance or to publish its name or picture.
SubScribe rating Heading **** Pictures *** Content ******* Total 14
Times:
Dog is hero - and hamster rescued - after explosion at house
Three-col photograph of dog and handler with wreckage in background; singles of hamster in cage and 'before' shot of house
110-word 'summary' story:
Clacton A sniffer dog that qualified only five days ago found a man who was trapped after a gas explosion ripped through a house early yesterday morning. A hamster, still in its cage was also rescued alive. Kirby, a Springer spaniel, found the man on the top floor of the three-storey building. Graham Currie, her handler, said: "It is incredible to think those skills have already potentially saved a life."
The man was among six people, including a woman who is seven months pregnant and two children, who survived. A woman in her late seventies suffered serious burns after the blast in the ground-floor flat at Clacton, Essex.
Names the dog, the breed, and its handler - and quotes him - but identifies none of the blast survivors or name the hamster. Does say that Mrs Sainte-Marie (although without her name) is seven months pregnant and suggests where the blast originated. Has Kirby as 'her'; other papers say 'him'.
SubScribe rating Heading **** Pictures ***** Content ****** Total 15
Mirror:
A house..or flat?
Four-col photograph of the rubble with 'before' picture of house in inset circle
100-word caption story:
Trapped and forgotten in the rubble as this collapsed block of flats burnt, Kersey Vythilingum was only saved when a rescue dog sniffed him out.
Neighbours were lifted free after a gas explosion tore through the three-story building yesterday but thought Mr Vythilingum, 30, was at work.
Instead he was several feet under, bashing debris to alert firefighters. It was not until the springer spaniel Kirby came to the scene at Clacton, Essex, he was found and taken to hospital.
Neighbour Clarel Sainte-Marie, 37, said: "He owes his life to that dog."
In this case, there is too much emphasis on the rescue, to the detriment of the whole story. Fails to tell us how many people survived - or indeed that the neighbour quoted was among those who escaped the wreckage. Contradictory in that Mr Vythilingum was apparently both "forgotten" and "thought to have been elsewhere". Given the focus on the hero dog, might have found room to mention that it had found the man within a minute (which we learn from the Guardian, below).No picture of dog or any human being. Headline is flippant.
SubScribe rating Heading * Pictures * Content ** Total 4
Guardian:
Dog rescues man from gas blast house
Six-par single-col story with picture of dog inset, byline credits PA.
An elderly man was rescued yesterday from the rubble of his house, which had been destroyed in a suspected gas explosion, by a sniffer dog which had only finished its training last Thursday....
The rescued man was 30; hardly elderly. Clumsy subordinate clause in the intro, misplacement of the word "only" (the Mirror made the same error). Names the dog and handler, but none of the occupants of the house. Does tell us that the dog had special shoes to protect its paws and that it found Mr Vythilingum in less than a minute. Also says that 60 people had to leave their homes as a result of the blast, but misuses the word 'evacuated' to impart the information. Plenty of quotes, but no mention of the critically ill old lady, the Sainte-Marie family's escape to the roof - or the hamster.
A lost opportunity for pictures - it's not a page lead story for a quality paper, but a home could have been found for the pictures somewhere. Extra points for the shoes, the timing and the byline counter some of the missing elements
SubScribe rating Heading *** Picture ** Content ***** Total 10
Telegraph:
House blast Dog saves man trapped in rubble...and hamster has lucky escape too
Three-col aerial shot of wreckage, single col pix of hamster and of his cage in the debris
160-word caption story
A man who was trapped under rubble after an explosion caused a house to collapse was freed yesterday with the help of a novice rescue dog.
The dog, Kirby, which qualified last Thursday, was called into action with firemen and police after a suspected gas explosion at a house, divided into three flats, in Clacton, Essex.
a family of four was rescued from the roof and firemen saved a woman and the man under the rubble.
A hamster was also rescued 12 hours after the explosion and is reported to be well with no ill effects. It was taken to Haven Veterinary Practice for a check and a clean-up.
About 60 people were evacuated from nearby homes.
Assistant divisional officer Neil Holloway said the house was "almost totally collapsed" and added: "It is extremely lucky that no one died."
Graham Currie, Kirby's handler, said: "It took him less than a minute to locate the man in the rubble."
Clumsy intro, I paused and thought the trapped man had caused the house to collapse, then had to re-read. Interesting to learn that the hamster was found 12 hours after the event - no one else had this - but with this sort of space perhaps we could have had a bit more about the people and the fact that an old woman is in hospital with serious burns rather than details of the hamster's medical treatment. Misuse of the word 'evacuated' again and some rather pointless quotes. There is a huge picture; we don't need to be told the house is "almost totally collapsed", we can see for ourselves. The hamster cage lodged in the wreckage was interesting, but there should have been a picture of Kirby.
SubScribe rating Heading *** Pictures ** Content ******* Total 12
Independent
Accident Gas blast demolishes house
Double col pic of collapsed house with Mr Sainte-Marie in the foreground, halfstick of Kirby and handler
One par caption
Clarel Sainte Marie, above, walked away unharmed from his flat after a suspected gas explosion in the early hours of the morning demolished a house in Clacton, Essex. The sniffer dog Kirby, right, discovered an injured resident buried in the rubble and a family of four were rescued from the roof. PA
The sub here had the least space to work in, but squandered some of it with words such as 'of the morning'. Has failed to realise that Mr Sainte Marie (the papers are divided about whether the name is hyphenated) is one of the family of four saved from the roof. It is also not entirely clear that his flat was in the demolished house. The copy says he is unharmed, but the picture has him with a huge plaster under his lip. Not a life-threatening injury, perhaps, but it means the word could have been deleted to make space for something that worked harder. No mention of the old lady.
SubScribe rating Heading * Pictures * Content * Total 3
The Sun
You little bootie
Sniffer dog saves man buried in gas explosion
Four-col pic of wreckage, overlaid with pix of Clarel and Laura Sainte-Marie, firemen with the rescued hamster in its cage, 'before' pic of house; big cutout pic of Kirby, halfstick of Kersley
A spaniel saved a man buried under rubble after a three-storey house was demolished in a gas blast yesterday.
Clever Kirby, wearing special boots to protect his paws, sniffed out care worker Kersley Vythinlingum, 30, as he lay in a daze....
This story has almost everything in 250 words; not only just about every fact in every other paper, but also Mrs Sainte-Marie's first name and her occupation plus her account of what happened and how her husband had taken them to safety - meaningful description, not 'it's a miracle' banalities. It also quotes the dog handler and tells us that Kirby is four. The discovery of the hamster is the payoff and the only fault (apart from a repetition of Mr Vythinlingum's age) is the failure to tell us its name.
SubScribe rating Heading ***** Pictures ***** Content ********** Total 20
None of this really matters a jot, of course, but it was a fascinating exercise. My one golden rule is that if you have a story that includes an animal ALWAYS NAME IT!
Thank you for sticking with it to the end. Please do share your thoughts below. And please take a look at the other posts. They are all media related.
Sold down the river the Beeb's flotilla and fireworks fiasco - and a feeble fightback. Why didn't the top man have his hand on the tiller?
Hello and goodbye to Wapping a personal diary of life inside the fortress in the days before the strike that changed newspapers forever
Out of print a love letter to newspapers in this digital age. Why they don't have to die if we have the will to let them live and thrive
Why local newspapers matter Why we should care about the revolution in the regional press
Missing: an opportunity How the hunt for Madeleine McCann could be turned into a force for good instead of just a festival of mawkish sentimentality
Riding for a fall Does buying a ticket for a jolly day out at the races mean you are fair game for the snobs who sneer and snipe?
Just a pretty face Illustrating the business pages isn't the easiest job in the world, but spare us the celebs who aren't even mentioned in the story
Food for thought a case study in why we should take health advice with a pinch of salt (and a glass of red wine and a helping of roast beef)
The world's gone mad Don Draper returns and the drooling thirtysomethings go into overdrive But does anybody watch the show? (But there is more Whipple in this post!)
Sunday, 19 February 2012
Relatively speaking
Two people drown. We know their relationship, but not their names, and details of their lives are scant.
The Telegraph coverage ran thus:
Grandmother and boy drown feeding ducks
A grandmother and her six-year-old grandson drowned in a village pond while feeding ducks, police said last night.
The report goes on to say that the woman was 71, that she was a widow, and that a neighbour thought she was fond of ballet.
Not a lot to go on, perhaps, but enough to allow the writer and sub to have done better.
First the heading: Was she a woman who happened to be a grandmother? Was the boy her grandson or someone unrelated? Funnily enough, Boy and grandmother drown... would have made it clear. The published version doesn't.
Then the intro: This time the relationship is hammered home too much. An obvious, but dull, variation would have been A woman and her six-year-old grandson...
We know she's a widow, so maybe that would have been a better opener? But perhaps we care more about the death of a child than that of the woman looking after him, so should he come first?
Even in simple stories, we need to be aware that the way we express relationships implies some level of judgment. We carelessly write about 'a plumber and his wife' as though the woman were no more than an appendage.
The same applies if we start a story, for example, A mother of four ... Maybe we are just using the one piece of information that saves us from A woman..., in which case fair enough. But unless motherhood is the prime reason for the woman being in the news, we should try to avoid it. How often do we start stories A father of four...?
Back to the village pond: The Times approached it thus:
Widow drowns with grandson in village lake
A boy of six and his 71-year-old grandmother have been found dead in a village lake.
The headline was double column, so the configuration was more restricted than the Telegraph's banner.
But after that, it gets interesting. There is no doubt, looking at the pictures, that it was a lake rather than a pond, but that doesn't have the same ring. Is it stretching journalistic licence too far to go with pond?
We also know the purpose of their outing only from what the police have surmised, so The Times plays it cautiously, waiting until the second par to say they were 'thought to have stopped to feed ducks'. Again, is that being too prissy or simple accuracy?
Unlike the Telegraph, The Times names the pair. It turns out that the grandmother is a retired nursery school teacher. I think I'd have liked to have known before the third par that this woman had professional experience of looking after young children. It may add to our feelings of sympathy - or the reverse - but it is definitely relevant. I'd have made it the intro, thus:
A retired nursery teacher and her six-year-old grandson drowned while feeding ducks in a village lake yesterday.
Then the boy could have taken precedence in the heading...but the permutations are endless.
Meanwhile, two and a half cheers for the Telegraph's coverage of Dr Finella Brita-Babapulle's brush with the law:
Doctor waged gay smear 'war' on ex-husband after divorce cash row
A respected consultant haematologist subjected her former husband to a series of homosexual smears because she felt she was cheated out of £430,000 in their bitter divorce.
Hurrah, no dreaded 'female' or 'woman'. The reporter (presumably a casual as no named byline) gets it spot on with her profession up front, letting the 'her former husband' do the gender bit. We might question the need to say it was a 'bitter' divorce - most that end up in a criminal court are - but that's a quibble.
Similarly, do we really need those quotes round 'war'. She's been convicted of harassment and she has challenged him in every court in the land, so it wouldn't have been too naughty to leave them off.
But both head and intro were compelling enough to encourage the reader to learn more.
*image by Bobbie Peachey, http://webclipart.about.com
Thank you for sticking with it to the end. Please do share your thoughts below. And please take a look at the other posts. They are all media related.
Sold down the river the Beeb's flotilla and fireworks fiasco - and a feeble fightback. Why didn't the top man have his hand on the tiller?
Hello and goodbye to Wapping a personal diary of life inside the fortress in the days before the strike that changed newspapers forever
Out of print a love letter to newspapers in this digital age. Why they don't have to die if we have the will to let them live and thrive
Why local newspapers matter Why we should care about the revolution in the regional press
Missing: an opportunity How the hunt for Madeleine McCann could be turned into a force for good instead of just a festival of mawkish sentimentality
Riding for a fall Does buying a ticket for a jolly day out at the races mean you are fair game for the snobs who sneer and snipe?
Just a pretty face Illustrating the business pages isn't the easiest job in the world, but spare us the celebs who aren't even mentioned in the story
Food for thought a case study in why we should take health advice with a pinch of salt (and a glass of red wine and a helping of roast beef)
The world's gone mad Don Draper returns and the drooling thirtysomethings go into overdrive But does anybody watch the show? (But there is more Whipple in this post!)
Saturday, 18 February 2012
Information overload
David Cameron is the Prime Minister. Ilfracombe is in North Devon. The Bowleven oil company is based in Edinburgh. The Oxford Bible Commentary was edited in 2001 by John Barton and John Muddiman. The taxpayer owns 83% of RBS.
Readers may be interested in any or all of these facts - but not necessarily in an opening paragraph. Who cares about the geography or history of the subject of a story before discovering what he, she or it has done?
Take this intro from the front page of The Guardian:
Teachers at Gateway primary school, in Marylebone, central London, have noticed that anxiety about the introduction of a new housing benefit cap is beginning to unsettle some pupils.
So what is most important here? The teachers? The specific primary school? Its exact location? Or the children? Why all those commas and geography before we get to the point?
There are, of course, many ways of telling a story...but how about this:
Children as young as eight are fretting that they might lose their homes if housing benefit is capped, teachers say.
(The age and precise concerns were detailed lower in the story).
The key is to focus on what counts and get that message across before the reader falls asleep or turns the page. That doesn't preclude delayed drops and other such invitations to read on, but the fewer commas (and parentheses) there are in an intro, the easier it is to read.
And yes, this is an egg-sucking lesson, but some of us need it. Did your grandma actually know how to suck eggs? Mine didn't. Sometimes we have to go back to basics..
If it's vital to the understanding of the story, put it up top. If it's a detail that can wait, let it come in naturally later on.
And then there's the exception that proves the rule. Take this glorious effort from Martin Fletcher in The Times
Chris Tappin seems an improbable criminal. Silver-haired, bespectacled and slightly deaf, the retired businessman lives in an elegant house in Orpington, heads the Kent Golf Union, representing the county's 95 clubs, plays bridge and dotes on his grandson.
From another pen that would probably have been too, too much information. But it is just brilliant.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)